On 2018/06/26 23:43, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-Jun-25, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>> On 2018-Jun-18, David Rowley wrote:
>>>> I've attached a patch which cleans up my earlier version and moves the
>>>> setup of the append_rel_array into its own function instead of
>>>> sneaking code into setup_simple_rel_arrays(). I've also now updated
>>>> the comment above find_childrel_appendrelinfo(), which is now an
>>>> unused function.
>>
>>> I checked that this patch fixes the originally reported performance
>>> regression.
>>> Unless there are objections, I intend to push this patch tomorrow.
>>
>> If find_childrel_appendrelinfo is now unused, we should remove it.
>
> Agreed -- thanks for following up. Pushed that way.
I noticed that there is a typo in a comment, fixed as follows in the
attached patch.
/*
- * append_rel_list is the same length as the above arrays, and holds
+ * append_rel_array is the same length as the above arrays, and holds
* pointers to the corresponding AppendRelInfo entry indexed by
* child_relid, or NULL if none. The array itself is not allocated if
* append_rel_list is empty.
Thanks,
Amit