> On 10/28/15 10:27 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
>> See subject. Aside from them being divvied up by datatype, they seem
>> to be ordered randomly. Since I'm putting together a patch that will
>> add some GUCs, do I just add them to the end of the list?
>
> The initial commit grouped them logically, and it went downhill from
> there. :)
Some "per-section" comments in the file would help to remain consistent.
--
Fabien.