Re: PL/PgSQL: RAISE and the number of parameters

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fabien COELHO
Тема Re: PL/PgSQL: RAISE and the number of parameters
Дата
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.10.1408121911040.9746@sto
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PL/PgSQL: RAISE and the number of parameters  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: PL/PgSQL: RAISE and the number of parameters  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> one note: this patch can enforce a compatibility issues - a partially 
> broken functions, where some badly written RAISE statements was executed 
> newer.

> I am not against this patch, but it should be in extra check probably ??

I'm not sure about what you mean by "it should be in extra check".

> Or we have to documented it as potential compatibility issue.

Indeed, as a potential execution error is turned into a certain 
compilation error.

If this compatibility point is a blocker, the compilation error can be 
turned into a warning, but I would prefer to keep it an error: I'm quite 
sure I fell into that pit at least once or twice.

-- 
Fabien.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [RFC] Should smgrtruncate() avoid sending sinval message for temp relations
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [RFC] Should smgrtruncate() avoid sending sinval message for temp relations