On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Tom Lane <
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 2008-03-04 05:45:47 EST [6698]: [1-1] LOG: process 6698 still waiting for
> AccessShareLock on relation 1247 of database 16385 after 1001.519 ms
> 2008-03-04 05:45:47 EST [6698]: [2-1] STATEMENT: VACUUM FULL
> autograph.autograph_creators
> 2008-03-04 05:46:28 EST [6730]: [1-1] LOG: process 6730 still waiting for
> AccessShareLock on relation 1247 of database 16385 after 1000.887 ms
> 2008-03-04 05:46:28 EST [6730]: [2-1] STATEMENT: VACUUM FULL
> lunchmoney.totals
> 2008-03-04 05:47:55 EST [3809]: [18-1] LOG: server process (PID 6742) was
> terminated by signal 6: Aborted
> 2008-03-04 05:47:55 EST [3809]: [19-1] LOG: terminating any other active
> server processes
> 2008-03-04 05:47:55 EST [6741]: [12-1] WARNING: terminating connection
> because of crash of another server process
How annoying ... the PANIC message doesn't seem to have reached the log.
elog.c is careful to fflush(stderr) before abort(), so that isn't
supposed to happen. But it looks like you are using syslog for logging
(correct?) so maybe this is a problem with the syslog implementation
you're using. What's the platform exactly?
I wonder if it'd be reasonable to put a closelog() call just before
the abort() ...
regards, tom lane
The panic may have made it if this is what you were looking for:
2008-03-04 05:45:20 EST [6742]: [7-1] PANIC: deadlock detected
2008-03-04 05:58:33 EST [8751]: [3-1] PANIC: deadlock detected
(it cored twice before I lowered the concurrency of vacuums)