Re: Seq Scan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tyler Durden
Тема
Re: Seq Scan
Дата
Msg-id
ab07320e0706011024n4383117an1d69b96584536a71@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: Seq Scan (Joshua D. Drake)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Seq Scan "Tyler Durden" <tylersticky@gmail.com>
Re: Seq Scan "John D. Burger" <john@mitre.org>
Re: Seq Scan "Tyler Durden" <tylersticky@gmail.com>
Re: Seq Scan Kevin Hunter <hunteke@earlham.edu>
Re: Seq Scan Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Seq Scan "Tyler Durden" <tylersticky@gmail.com>
Re: Seq Scan "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: Seq Scan "Tyler Durden" <tylersticky@gmail.com>
Re: Seq Scan Reece Hart <reece@harts.net>
Re: Seq Scan Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>
Ok, my bad.
But why this happens:
# explain ANALYZE select id from table_name where id>200000;
                                                                 QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Index Scan using table_name_pkey on table_name  (cost=0.00..2618.96
rows=68960 width=4) (actual time=220.543..1479.495 rows=66730 loops=1)
   Index Cond: (id > 200000)
 Total runtime: 1504.839 ms
(3 rows)

dun=# explain ANALYZE select id from table_name where id>10;
                                                      QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Seq Scan on table_name  (cost=0.00..9268.12 rows=266703 width=4)
(actual time=107.935..2733.592 rows=266720 loops=1)
   Filter: (id > 10)
 Total runtime: 2833.744 ms
(3 rows)


It uses Index Scan for id>200000 and Seq Scan for id>10?!

On 6/1/07, Joshua D. Drake  wrote:

> Nothing. You have to scan the table because you aren't giving postgresql
> anything to use the index by.
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Joshua D. Drake
Дата:
От: Dudás József
Дата:
FAQ