Re: Thomas Munro
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 9:15 PM Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:
> > No XXX lines this time either, but I've seen then im logfiles that
> > went through successfully.
>
> Do you still have the data directories around from that run, so we can
> see if the expected Heap2/PRUNE was actually logged? For example
> (using meson layout here, in the build directory) that'd be something
> like:
Sorry for the late reply, getting the PG release out of the door was
more important.
> $ ./tmp_install/home/tmunro/install/bin/pg_waldump
>
testrun/recovery/031_recovery_conflict/data/t_031_recovery_conflict_standby_data/pgdata/pg_wal/000000010000000000000003
>
> In there I see this:
It's been a long day and I can't wrap my mind around understanding
this now, so I'll just dump the output here.
[0] 16:03 myon@sid-s390x.pgs390x:~/.../build/src/test/recovery $ LC_ALL=C
../../../tmp_install/usr/lib/postgresql/17/bin/pg_waldump
tmp_check/t_031_recovery_conflict_standby_data/pgdata/pg_wal/000000010000000000000003| grep -3 PRUNE > PRUNE.log
pg_waldump: error: error in WAL record at 0/347E6A8: invalid record length at 0/347E6E0: expected at least 24, got 0
Christoph