Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM
Дата
Msg-id YwgZDna+jiIN9fY/@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 08:45:05PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I'm leaning towards considering it a feature-change and thus not
> something to backpatch (I'd be OK sneaking it into 15 though, as that
> one is not released yet and it feels like a perfectly *safe* change).
> Not enough to insist on it, but it seems "slightly more correct".

Fine by me if both you and Daniel want to be more careful with this
change.  We could always argue about a backpatch later if there is
more ask for it, as well.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Yuya Watari
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation