On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 06:29:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> writes:
> > v4 looks good to me.
>
> Pushed with very minor editorialization. Mainly, I undid the
> decision to stop printing the function source text, on the
> grounds that (1) it falsified the comment immediately above,
> and (2) if you have to print it anyway to avoid compiler warnings,
> you're just creating confusing inconsistency between the two
> handler functions.
Sounds good to me, thanks!
Regards,
Mark