On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 07:24:58PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2022-04-19 Tu 18:39, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> +*generate_ascii_string = *TestLib::generate_ascii_string;
>> +*slurp_dir = *TestLib::slurp_dir;
>> +*slurp_file = *TestLib::slurp_file;
>>
>> I am not sure if it is possible and my perl-fu is limited in this
>> area, but could a failure be enforced when loading this path if a new
>> routine added in TestLib.pm is forgotten in this list?
>
> Not very easily that I'm aware of, but maybe some superior perl wizard
> will know better.
Okay. Please do not consider this as a blocker. I was just wondering
about ways to ease more the error reports when it comes to
back-patching, and this would move the error stack a bit earlier.
--
Michael