On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 11:52:33AM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> That was easy enough to add (just a bit of extra fiddling to handle
> COLUMN being optional), done in the attached v2 patch.
This part was a bit misleading, as it would recommend a list of types
when specifying just ADD CONSTRAINT for example, so I have removed
it. An extra thing that felt a bit overdoing is the addition of KEY
after PRIMARY/FOREIGN.
> Doing a list of arbitrarily many comma-separated names is more
> complicated, so that can be the subject for another patch.
No objections to that. I have applied what we have now, as that's
already an improvement.
--
Michael