Re: More time spending with "delete pending"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Michael Paquier
Тема
Re: More time spending with "delete pending"
Дата
Msg-id
YOvOlfRrIO0yGtgw@paquier.xyz
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
More time spending with "delete pending" Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Re: More time spending with "delete pending" Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: More time spending with "delete pending" Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Re: More time spending with "delete pending" Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: More time spending with "delete pending" Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: More time spending with "delete pending" Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Re: More time spending with "delete pending" Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: More time spending with "delete pending" Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Re: More time spending with "delete pending" Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Re: More time spending with "delete pending" Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 01:07:17PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks, that matches my impression.  There was one comment at the top
> of _pgstat64() that was still incorrect.  I have spent more time
> checking and tested this stuff today, and that looks fine.  One
> question pending is if we should increase the timeout used by WIN32's
> stat() and open(), but the buildfarm should be able to tell us more
> here.

And fairywren, that uses MinGW, is unhappy:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=fairywren&dt=2021-07-12%2004%3A47%3A13
Looking at it now.
--
Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Amul Sul
Дата:
От: Dilip Kumar
Дата:
FAQ