Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM
От
Michael Paquier
Тема
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM
Дата
Msg-id
YOpwhZFOpC0UUQaB@paquier.xyz
Ответ на
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM (Jacob Champion)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>
RE: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM "Mikhail Kulagin" <m.kulagin@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 11:31:48PM +0000, Jacob Champion wrote: > On Thu, 2021-07-08 at 16:27 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> + * outputlen: The length (0 or higher) of the client response buffer, >> + * invalid if output is NULL. > > nitpick: maybe "ignored" instead of "invalid"? Thanks, applied as 44bd012 after using your suggestion. Another thing I noticed after more review is that the check in fe-auth.c to make sure that a message needs to be generated if the exchange is not completed yet has no need to depend on "success", only "done". -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления