Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements
От
Michael Paquier
Тема
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements
Дата
Msg-id
YMvvZp96z7xffnok@paquier.xyz
Ответ на
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements (Andres Freund)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Centralizing protective copying of utility statements Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 02:08:34PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > Unfortunately github is annoying to search through - it doesn't seem to > have any logic to prevent duplicates across repositories :(. Which means > there's dozens of copies of postgres code included... I agree with the position of doing something now while in beta. I have not looked at the tree, but I am rather sure that we had changes in the hooks while in beta phase in the past. >> which admittedly is more than none, but it's not a huge number >> either. I have to think that fixing this bug reliably is a >> more important consideration. > > Sure! The DECLARE CURSOR case in ExplainOneUtility() does a copy of a Query. Perhaps a comment should be added to explain why a copy is still required? -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Andres Freund
Дата: