Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Michael Paquier
Тема
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node?
Дата
Msg-id
YBTFgGiLki8eKE7M@paquier.xyz
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 08:53:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan  writes:
>> I don't know anybody that still runs Postgres
>> (or anything like it) on a 32-bit platform. I think that Michael
>> Paquier owns a Raspberry Pi zero, but that hardly counts.

hamster died a couple of years ago, it was a RPI1 and I have not
bought one after.  RIP to it.  I still have dangomushi, a RPI2, based
on armv7l and that's 32-bit.  Heikki has chipmunk, which is a RPI1
last time we discussed about that.  The good thing about those
machines is that they are low-energy consumers, and silent.  So it is
easy to forget about them and just let them be.

> Hmph ... three of my five buildfarm animals are 32-bit, plus I
> have got 32-bit OSes for my Raspberry Pi ;-).  Admittedly, none
> of those represent hardware someone would put a serious database
> on today.  But in terms of testing diversity, I think they're
> a lot more credible than thirty-one flavors of Linux on x86_64.

Those 32-bit modules are still being sold actively by the RPI
foundation, and used as cheap machines for education purposes, so I
think that it is still useful for Postgres to have active buildfarm
members for 32-bit architectures.
--
Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
FAQ