On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 07:25:37AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> It looks like we are not getting any consensus on this approach. One
> reduced version I would consider is just the second part, so you'd write
> something like
>
> snprintf(lsnchar, sizeof(lsnchar), "%X/%X",
> LSN_FORMAT_ARGS(lsn));
>
> This would still reduce notational complexity quite a bit but avoid any
> funny business with the format strings.
That seems reasonable to me. So +1.
--
Michael