On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 12:17:58PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> It does raise an interesting point though, if we in the future add suppprt for
> SCRAM-SHA-512 (which seems reasonable to do) it's not good enough to have a
> single GUC for SCRAM iterations; we'd need to be able to set the iteration
> count per algorithm. I'll account for that when updating the patch downthread.
So, you mean that the GUC should be named like password_iterations,
taking a grammar with a list like 'scram-sha-256=4096,algo2=5000'?
--
Michael