Re: Postresql RFD version 2.0 Help Wanted.

Mike Cox  wrote in news:2v4mbfF2i3beoU1@uni-
berlin.de:

> Since we have the discussion going, someone mentioned that the group name
> should be comp.databases.postgresql.  I think this is a good name and I'd
> like to see what everyone thinks of it.

Much better, especially if you are only proposing a single newsgroup in the 
hierarchy. Use of the word "general" is unnecessary, and cumbersome.

-- 
Bill