Re: Row Limit on tables
От | Curt Sampson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Row Limit on tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.NEB.4.43.0206010306550.657-100000@angelic.cynic.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Row Limit on tables (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Row Limit on tables
Re: Row Limit on tables |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > In practice, "what will fit on your disk" is the limit. Actually, not even. Or so I think for most cases. Playing around with my little 500M row table, I notice that the table itself is only 25 GB, and even with 4 indices, the whole shebang is less than 60 GB. What's killing me is disk access speed. Currently, my "standard" query is 70 sec., entirely due to limitations on the number of random I/Os I can do per second. I can fairly cheaply halve this problem by striping the database across two disks, but then I double the space available. If that leads me to double the database size, I'm back in the same hole I was in before, maybe worse. It's way, way too easy these days to run up a terrabyte of RAID-5 storage. One Escalade 7850 controller ($500) plus eight 160 GB drives ($250 each) sets you out about $2500. But the problem is, all this storage often doesn't have the I/O bandwidth you need actually to make use of it.... cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: