Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql?
| От | Dennis Bjorklund | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0504050900340.16409-100000@zigo.dhs.org обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) | 
| Ответы | Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Tom Lane wrote: > CREATE FUNCTION sum_n_product(x int, y int, OUT sum int, OUT prod int) AS $$ > BEGIN > sum := x + y; > prod := x * y; > RETURN; > END; > $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql; > > The RETURN statement is kinda useless in this example, but it is still > required, because we don't allow control to fall off the end of a > plpgsql function without causing an error. > > I am thinking we should allow exit by falling off the end of the > function when (a) it has output parameter(s), or (b) it is declared > "RETURNS void". Comments? The above code example do not have any RETURNS clause, does that mean that it defaults to RETURNS void? I don't see what (a) has to do with anything. The return value is independent of in/out:ness of the parameters, isn't it? -- /Dennis Björklund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: