Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0310220751460.29086-100000@peter.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Ответы Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:

> > Oh dear.  We really need this function-specific schema path that the SQL
> > standard seems to talk about.
>
> What's that?  How would it help?

The idea is that you give each function its own schema search path at
creation time, and that path applies to that function for the rest of its
life.  Then that function would be immune to schema path changes later on.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Следующее
От: Neil Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 7.4 compatibility question