Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0102141808310.1112-100000@peter.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Re: Recovery of PGSQL after system crash failing!!!  (Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql@rkirkpat.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> > Also, could the "-F" option be disabled now that WAL is enabled? Or is
> > there still some reason to encourage/allow folks to use it?
>
> I was the one who put it back in after Vadim turned it off ;-) ... and
> I'll object to any attempt to remove the option.

The description should be updated though:
http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/runtime-config.htm#RUNTIME-CONFIG-GENERAL

I guess a lot of people have heard the rumour "PG 7.1 offers no-fsync
performance with fsync turned on" and extrapolated "Imagine what it can do
if I turn off fsync anyway."

-- 
Peter Eisentraut      peter_e@gmx.net       http://yi.org/peter-e/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Open 7.1 items
Следующее
От: Fred Yankowski
Дата:
Сообщение: possible to create CVS branch for proposed patch?