Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone?
От
Peter Eisentraut
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone?
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.21.0001192117280.5544-200000@localhost.localdomain
Ответ на
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
gperf anyone? Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
On 2000-01-18, Tom Lane mentioned: > I agree with Don that the performance benefit is likely to be > unmeasurable. Still, there could be a win: we currently have to modify > keywords.c by hand every time we have to add/delete a keyword. Does > gperf offer any aid for maintaining the keyword list? If so, that'd > be sufficient reason to switch to it... That's a good point. It would allow you much more ordering freedom. The file is attached for review. Of course adding/deleting keywords would now require gperf. :( -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
