Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN?
От
Jonathan Bartlett
Тема
Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN?
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.GSU.4.44.0306170750190.11938-100000@eskimo.com
Ответ на
Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? (Bruno Wolff III)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? "Daniel Seichter" <daniel@dseichter.de>
Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb@eskimo.com>
Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? Jason Earl <jason.earl@simplot.com>
Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN?] "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: postgreSQL Tino Wildenhain <tino@wildenhain.de>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: Ernest E Vogelsinger <ernest@vogelsinger.at>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb@eskimo.com>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb@eskimo.com>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: Ernest E Vogelsinger <ernest@vogelsinger.at>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: Ernest E Vogelsinger <ernest@vogelsinger.at>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb@eskimo.com>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb@eskimo.com>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb@eskimo.com>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Re: postgreSQL on NAS/SAN? "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
There is a system which uses your serial port so that if server B detects server A goes down, it will send a signal over the serial port which disconnects server A's power supply. That way, server B never "accidentally" takes over for server A when in fact server A is still running. I don't remember where these are sold, but they were mentioned in the MissionCriticalLinux system documentation. Jon On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 15:41:45 +0200, > Daniel Seichter wrote: > > Hello Scott, > > > > > Are you looking more for failover, load balancing, hot > > > spare? > > I am looking for a hot spare, so if one server crashed, the second will > > "spare" it, because if this database will be down (down is meant for longer > > than 2 hours) more than two other databases will not continue working (they > > could continue working, but without new data, so it will be senseless). > > Once the orignal postmaster has stopped running (say because its server > died) you could run a different postmaster (on say another server) and > access the same data on your storage system. But if you do this you > will want some sort of safety system so that two postmasters can't > accidentally run at the same time. The normal interlock won't work for you > because it keeps a PID file and checks to see if the pid in that file (if any) > is still running. That doesn't work accross servers. > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления