On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > Stupid question here ... but ... can't this kludge be "faked" in the ODBC
> > driver itself, vs in the server? *raised eyebrow*
>
> Right now, the ODBC driver does not do full parsing of the input
> queries, so imho it would be difficult to reliably identify the correct
> string substitution.
Ah, there went that idea ... to bad we couldn't put some sort of check in
the server "if through odbc driver, allow this kludge" :)
You say 'right now' ... is full parsing something that the ODBC driver
should be done?