RE: ResourceOwner refactoring

Dear Heikki,

I tested in the same situation, and I confirmed that almost same results are returned.
(results are at the end of the e-mail)

You think that these results are acceptable
because resowners own many resources(more than 64) in general
and it's mainly faster in such a situation, isn't it?

I cannot distinguish correctly, but sounds good.

====test result====

unpatched

 numkeep | numsnaps | lifo_time_ns | fifo_time_ns 
---------+----------+--------------+--------------
       0 |        1 |         68.5 |         69.9
       0 |        5 |         73.2 |         76.8
       0 |       10 |         70.6 |         74.7
       0 |       60 |         68.0 |         75.6
       0 |       70 |         91.3 |         94.8
       0 |      100 |         89.0 |         89.1
       0 |     1000 |         97.9 |         98.9
       0 |    10000 |        116.0 |        115.9
       9 |       10 |         74.7 |         76.6
       9 |      100 |         80.8 |         80.1
       9 |     1000 |         86.0 |         86.2
       9 |    10000 |        116.1 |        116.8
      65 |       70 |         84.7 |         85.3
      65 |      100 |         80.5 |         80.3
      65 |     1000 |         86.3 |         86.2
      65 |    10000 |        115.4 |        115.9
(16 rows)

patched

 numkeep | numsnaps | lifo_time_ns | fifo_time_ns 
---------+----------+--------------+--------------
       0 |        1 |         62.4 |         62.6
       0 |        5 |         68.0 |         66.9
       0 |       10 |         73.6 |         78.1
       0 |       60 |         82.3 |         87.2
       0 |       70 |         83.0 |         89.1
       0 |      100 |         82.8 |         87.9
       0 |     1000 |         88.2 |         96.6
       0 |    10000 |        119.6 |        124.5
       9 |       10 |         62.0 |         62.8
       9 |      100 |         75.3 |         78.0
       9 |     1000 |         82.6 |         89.3
       9 |    10000 |        116.6 |        122.6
      65 |       70 |         66.7 |         66.4
      65 |      100 |         74.6 |         77.2
      65 |     1000 |         82.1 |         88.2
      65 |    10000 |        118.0 |        124.1
(16 rows)

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED