Re: Should this require CASCADE?
| От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should this require CASCADE? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOGEBICDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Should this require CASCADE? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Should this require CASCADE?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
With all this dependency stuff, what happens with the ALTER TABLE / DROP NOT NULL syntax we came up with? Maybe we should allow RESTRICT/CASCADE on that syntax and if restrict is specified, you can't drop it if a primary key depends on it and if cascade is specified it will drop the primary key... Just for consistency... Also, when talking about whether or not the index supporting a constraint should be sort of 'hidden' from the user, should not we change pg_dump to dump unique indices using the ALTER TABLE syntax, rather than the CREATE UNIQUE INDEX syntax? Otherwise this information will be lost. Chris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: