> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla@users.sourceforge.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 12:46 PM
> To: Cristina Surroca
> Cc: Pedro C. Arias; PostgreSQL-GENERAL
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres Compare
>
>
> http://www.mysql.com/information/crash-me.php?ms_sql=on&postgres=on
>
> Due to the source of the data, take it with a grain of salt,
> but it will give you a good basic comparison of postgresql
> vs. m$ sql server. Please note the comparison is against
> postgresql 7.2.2; we've added a significant number of
> features since then. Also don't forget this comparison leaves
> out important features like postgresql's ability to support 7
> different procedural languages.
For the ODBC functions, our (CONNX) PostgreSQL driver supports all of
the functions listed and many others as well.
Here is the manual:
http://www.connx.com/products/connx/Connx%208.8%20UserGuide/connxcdd32.h
tm
If you click on the ODBC SQL Grammar book, there are lots of details
underneath of all the operations supported.
For instance, with our ODBC driver for PostgreSQL, you could query for
skew of the sample or the name of the month, etc. So, with PostgreSQL,
you can get that sort of additional functionality if it is wanted.
Also, for a PostgreSQL success story, we are currently using our own
native Win32 port of PostgreSQL to empower our data synchronization
engine.