Re: [HACKERS] Red-black trees: why would anyone want preorder orpostorder traversal?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Korotkov
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Red-black trees: why would anyone want preorder orpostorder traversal?
Дата
Msg-id CAPpHfduTcfYg26MReJtx3UvAz+yieRvdme=QnN2GGWqAUC_WpQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Red-black trees: why would anyone want preorder or postorder traversal?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
In short, therefore, I propose we rip out the DirectWalk and InvertedWalk
options along with their support code, and then drop the portions of
test_rbtree that are needed to exercise them.  Any objections?

+1,
I don't see any point in leaving DirectWalk and InvertedWalk in RB-tree.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dmitry Dolgov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] log_destination=file
Следующее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Re: DROP SUBSCRIPTION hangs if sub is disabled in the sametransaction