Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Korotkov
Тема Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines
Дата
Msg-id CAPpHfduO1p8aE8ZY33rMcoqG7gBhQL6P=rV6OHLH2HS6TXiHzA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2017-04-03 11:56:13 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Have you done x86 benchmarking?

I think unless such benchmarking is done in the next 24h we need to move
this patch to the next CF...

Thank you for your comments.
I didn't x86 benchmarking.  I even didn't manage to reproduce previous results on Power8.
Presumably, it's because previous benchmarks were done on bare metal, while now I have to some kind of virtual machine on IBM E880 where I can't reproduce any win of Power8 LWLock optimization.  But probably there is another reason.
Thus, I'm moving this patch to the next CF.

I see it's already moved. OK!

It doesn't seems to make sense to consider this patch unless we get access to suitable Power machine to reproduce benefits.
This is why I'm going to mark this patch "Returned with feedback".
Once we would get access to the appropriate machine, I will resubmit this patch.

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] ALTER INDEX .. SET STATISTICS ... behaviour
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error