On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Andrea Suisani <sickpig@opinioni.net> wrote:
>> sure you're right.
>>
>> It's just that my bet was on a higher throughput
>> when HT was isabled from the BIOS (as you stated
>> previously in this thread).
>
> Yes, mine too. It's bizarre. If I were you, I'd look into it more
> deeply. It may be a flaw in your test methodology (maybe you disabled
> the wrong cores?). If not, it would be good to know why the extra TPS
> to replicate elsewhere.
I'd recommend more synthetic benchmarks when trying to compare systems
like this. bonnie++, the memory stream test that Greg Smith was
working on, and so on. Get an idea what core differences the machines
display under such testing.