Re: refactoring basebackup.c

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeevan Ladhe
Тема Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Дата
Msg-id CANm22CjESZPRiGB5Cs3EJQhsKs8R5dbfYt8Z=ni4=TLMbcW9iw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: refactoring basebackup.c  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: refactoring basebackup.c  (tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

Please find the attached updated version of patch for ZSTD server side
compression.

This patch has following changes:

- Fixes the issue Tushar reported[1].
- Adds a tap test.
- Makes document changes related to zstd.
- Updates pg_basebackup help for pg_basebackup. Here I have chosen the
suggestion by Robert upthread (as given below):

>> I would be somewhat inclined to leave the level-only variant
>> undocumented and instead write it like this:
>>  -Z, --compress={[{client|server}-]{gzip|lz4}}[:LEVEL]|none}

- pg_indent on basebackup_zstd.c.

Thanks Tushar, for offline help for testing the patch.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6c3f1558-1e56-9946-78a2-c59340da1dbf%40enterprisedb.com

Regards,
Jeevan Ladhe

On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 21:30, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 1:01 AM Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)
<noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com> wrote:
> Thank you for developing a great feature.
> The current help message shown below does not seem to be able to specify the 'client-' or 'server-' for lz4 compression.
>  --compress = {[{client, server}-]gzip, lz4, none}[:LEVEL]
>
> The attached small patch fixes the help message as follows:
>  --compress = {[{client, server}-]{gzip, lz4}, none}[:LEVEL]

Hmm. After studying this a bit more closely, I think this might
actually need a bit more revision than what you propose here. In most
places, we use vertical bars to separate alternatives:

  -X, --wal-method=none|fetch|stream

But here, we're using commas in some places and the word "or" in one
case as well:

  -Z, --compress={[{client,server}-]gzip,lz4,none}[:LEVEL] or [LEVEL]

We're also not consistently using braces for grouping, which makes the
order of operations a bit unclear, and it makes no sense to put
brackets around LEVEL when it's the only thing that's part of that
alternative.

A more consistent way of writing the supported syntax would be like this:

  -Z, --compress={[{client|server}-]{gzip|lz4}}[:LEVEL]|LEVEL|none}

I would be somewhat inclined to leave the level-only variant
undocumented and instead write it like this:

  -Z, --compress={[{client|server}-]{gzip|lz4}}[:LEVEL]|none}

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Juan José Santamaría Flecha
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: OpenSSL conflicts with wincrypt.h
Следующее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: OpenSSL conflicts with wincrypt.h