Re: a verbose option for autovacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tommy Li
Тема Re: a verbose option for autovacuum
Дата
Msg-id CAMifU2WKdAJn-vDUQ6eS8DvCEqjAP2GjgJ_jGRu4bF367T7xAQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: a verbose option for autovacuum  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: a verbose option for autovacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi Stephen

> ... can set vacuum options on a table level which autovacuum should respect,
> such as vacuum_index_cleanup and vacuum_truncate.  For skip locked,
> autovacuum already will automatically release it's attempt to acquire a
> lock if someone backs up behind it for too long.

This is good information, I wasn't aware that autovacuum respected those settings.
In that case I'd like to focus specifically on the verbose aspect. 

My first thought was a new boolean configuration called "autovacuum_verbose".
I'd want it to behave similarly to autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit in that it can be
set globally or on a per-table basis.

Thoughts?


Tommy

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CheckpointLock needed in CreateCheckPoint()?
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables