Re: Broken lock management in policy.c.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Broken lock management in policy.c.
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZSk+oP3qZAgHgQrMd0QLA2zQngr-1wu+XNb28L=ZkW4pg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Broken lock management in policy.c.  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: Broken lock management in policy.c.  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> A security defined function could be used to address that, of course. That
> could have performance implications, naturally.

True.

I would also advise only referencing a single relation within the
SELECT FOR UPDATE.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: row_security GUC does not behave as documented
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 9.5 BLOCKER: regrole and regnamespace and quotes