Re: nodes/*funcs.c inconsistencies

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: nodes/*funcs.c inconsistencies
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZSaHtJmO1cPYj2Mhnr7CQj_8q2DgxxMKZPKt2Fnmdw_uQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: nodes/*funcs.c inconsistencies  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Ответы Re: nodes/*funcs.c inconsistencies  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> I'm surprised that this stuff was only ever used for logical decoding
> infrastructure so far.

On second thought, having tried it, one reason is that that breaks
things that are considered legitimate for historical reasons. For
example, AttrNumber is often used with READ_INT_FIELD(), which is an
int16. Whether or not it's worth fixing that by introducing a
READ_ATTRNUM_FIELD() (and so on) is not obvious to me.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: nodes/*funcs.c inconsistencies
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: upgrade failure from 9.5 to head