Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation

On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Daniel Farina <daniel@fdr.io> wrote:
> I remember hacking that out for testing sake.
>
> I can only justify it as a foot-gun to prevent someone from being
> stuck restarting the database to get a reasonable number in there.
> Let's CC Peter; maybe he can remember some thoughts about that.

On reflection I think it was entirely to do with the testing of the
patch.  I don't think that the minimum value of pg_stat_statements has
any real significance.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan