Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZQZKjsEsPL_41p9zpppk5ZHfGC8waWzNtU5SdakH0PB2g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> You could have a race, where
> there was a concurrent page deletion of the left sibling of the child
> page, then a concurrent insertion into the newly expanded keyspace of
> the parent. Therefore, the downlink in the parent (which is the
> "target", to use the patch's terminology) would not be a lower bound
> on items in the page.

Excuse me: I meant the newly expanded keyspace of the *child*. (The
parent's keyspace would have covered everything. It's naturally far
larger than either child's keyspace, since it typically has several
hundred pages.)


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Provide much better wait information in pg_stat_activity.
Следующее
От: Joel Jacobson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Provide much better wait information in pg_stat_activity.