Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases
| От | Vick Khera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CALd+dcei0CseoUpX-jZLvCeKnYOiKkXyOG-E-85j_0NF4-1caQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 5:11 AM, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote: > On 9/30/2016 2:06 AM, Rakesh Kumar wrote: >> >> We require complete data isolation. Absolutely nothing should be shared >> between two tenants. >> >> WHy would multiple dbs be any worse than multiple schemas in performance? > > > complete? use 1000s of seperate VM instances, one per tennant. > Well, VM's don't always provide 100% isolation, so separate hardware, with each on its own VLAN seems right to me. And then make sure your switch doesn't leak across VLANs. Your requirements need refinement, at the least :)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: