Re: Preventing indirection for IndexPageGetOpaque for known-size page special areas

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Borisov
Тема Re: Preventing indirection for IndexPageGetOpaque for known-size page special areas
Дата
Msg-id CALT9ZEFoowytECGUwRPG1XYTL-TXFseJ-HKMd2QmxPDtzdLxEA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Preventing indirection for IndexPageGetOpaque for known-size page special areas  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 11:12 AM Matthias van de Meent
<boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's a new 0001 to keep CFBot happy.

This seems like it would conflict with the proposal from
http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaD8wMN6i1mmuo+4ZNeGE3Hd57ys8uV8UZm7cneqy3W2g@mail.gmail.com
which I still hope to advance in some form at an appropriate time.
It may be weakly related to the current discussion, but I'd like to note that the other proposed patch for making XID's 64-bit [1] will store per-page-common xid data in the heap page special area. It doesn't contradict storing a nonce in this area also, but I'd appreciate it if we could avoid changing heap page special layout twice.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Luzanov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How about a psql backslash command to show GUCs?
Следующее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Showing I/O timings spent reading/writing temp buffers in EXPLAIN