Re: Add primary key/unique constraint using prefix columns of an index
| От | Vik Reykja |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Add primary key/unique constraint using prefix columns of an index |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CALDgxVs9N3K4sD_oOs5Wjt3neyNHE2U=_3AV6c3QW2=BaJiD+w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Add primary key/unique constraint using prefix columns of an index (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
Semi-private note to Simon: isn't this pretty much what I was advocating at the London meetup last month?
On 22 May 2012 18:24, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:+1
> Now that there are index only scans, there is a use case for having a
> composite index which has the primary key or a unique key as the
> prefix column(s) but with extra columns after that. Currently you
> would also need another index with exactly the primary/unique key,
> which seems like a waste of storage and maintenance.
>
> Should there be a way to declare a "unique" index with the unique
> property applying to a prefix of the indexed columns/expression? And
> having that, a way to turn that prefix into a primary key constraint?
>
> Of course this is easier said then done, but is there some reason for
> it not to be a to-do item?
Very useful
Semi-private note to Simon: isn't this pretty much what I was advocating at the London meetup last month?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: