Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Adam Brightwell
Тема Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review
Дата
Msg-id CAKRt6CTgJdeGFqXevrp-DizaeHmg8gNVqu8n5T=ix3JAvpwwDQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review  (Adam Brightwell <adam.brightwell@crunchydatasolutions.com>)
Ответы Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
All,
 
Currently, I am using int32 simply because int64 is causing some issues.  The issue is that genbki.pl is not able to associate it with the int8 type as defined in pg_type.h.  Therefore Schema_pg_authid in schemapg.h isn't defined correctly.  I've been digging and scratching my head on this one but I have reached a point where I think it would be better just to ask.

Attached is a quite trivial patch that addresses the int64 (C) to int8 (SQL) mapping issue.

Further digging revealed that Catalog.pm wasn't accounting for int64 (thanks Stephen).  Would it be better to include this change as a separate patch (as attached) or would it be preferable to include with a larger role attribute bitmask patch?

Thanks,
Adam
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Use of recent Russian TZ changes in regression tests
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GIN pageinspect functions