Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?
Дата
Msg-id CAKJS1f8vAPFNqoLA03bwK=LwyupMBuh6A472nTC3RkBZwcrxuw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Thanks for looking

On 11 May 2018 at 17:48, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> By the way,
>
> +            !resultRelInfo->ri_PartitionRoot)
>
> This should be resultRelInfo->ri_PartitionRoot == NULL, because the above
> gives an impression that ri_PartitionRoot is a Boolean.

If this is some new coding rule, then that's the first I've heard of it.

Scanning over the result of git grep -E "if \(!\w{1,}\)" it looks like
we have a bit of cleanup work to do before we can comply.

FWIW, I've previously been told off for the opposite.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?