On 4/7/22 12:37, Tom Lane wrote: > Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> writes: >>> On Apr 7, 2022, at 9:29 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> I wouldn't >>> fight too hard if people want to lengthen it to \dconfig for consistency >>> with set_config(). > >> I'd prefer \dconfig, but if the majority on this list view that as pedantically forcing them to type more, I'm not going to kick up a fuss about \dconf. > > Maybe I'm atypical, but I'm probably going to use tab completion > either way, so it's not really more keystrokes. The consistency > point is a good one that I'd not considered before.
Yeah I had thought about \dconfig too -- +1 to that, although I am fine with \dconf too.
\dconfig[+] gets my vote. I was going to say "conf" just isn't common jargon to say or write; but the one place it is - file extensions - is relevant and common. But still, I would go with the non-jargon form.