Re: Reasons for not overwriting processed wal archives?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: Reasons for not overwriting processed wal archives?
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwY0akhPwvEc5rbYyR_kh89vjm0PkVnsWCHbCD9WGghRig@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Reasons for not overwriting processed wal archives?  (Koen De Groote <kdg.dev@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Wednesday, May 18, 2022, Koen De Groote <kdg.dev@gmail.com> wrote:

States:

> It is advisable to test your proposed archive command to ensure that it indeed does not overwrite an existing file, and that it returns nonzero status in this case.

Why exactly is this?

Newer doc versions also say:

 This is an important safety feature to preserve the integrity of your archive in case of administrator error (such as sending the output of two different servers to the same archive directory).

David J.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Koen De Groote
Дата:
Сообщение: Reasons for not overwriting processed wal archives?
Следующее
От: Dominique Devienne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Who am I? Where am I connected?