Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 4:21 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:38 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> I have reviewed the v12-0002 patch and I have some comments. I see the
> latest version posted sometime back and if any of this comment is
> already fixed in this version then feel free to ignore that.
>
> In general, code still needs a lot more comments to make it readable
> and in some places, code formatting is also not as per PG standard so
> that needs to be improved.
> There are some other specific comments as listed below
>

Please see the latest patch-set (v14). Did some code-formatting, used
pg_indent as well.
Added more comments. Let me know specifically if some more comments or
formatting is needed.

> 1.
> @@ -925,7 +936,7 @@ ApplyLauncherRegister(void)
>   memset(&bgw, 0, sizeof(bgw));
>   bgw.bgw_flags = BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS |
>   BGWORKER_BACKEND_DATABASE_CONNECTION;
> - bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_RecoveryFinished;
> + bgw.bgw_start_time = BgWorkerStart_ConsistentState;
>
> What is the reason for this change, can you add some comments?

Sure, done.

>
> 2.
> ApplyLauncherShmemInit(void)
>  {
>   bool found;
> + bool foundSlotSync;
>
> Is there any specific reason to launch the sync worker from the
> logical launcher instead of making this independent?
> I mean in the future if we plan to sync physical slots as well then it
> wouldn't be an expandable design.
>
> 3.
> + /*
> + * Remember the old dbids before we stop and cleanup this worker
> + * as these will be needed in order to relaunch the worker.
> + */
> + copied_dbcnt = worker->dbcount;
> + copied_dbids = (Oid *)palloc0(worker->dbcount * sizeof(Oid));
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < worker->dbcount; i++)
> + copied_dbids[i] = worker->dbids[i];
>
> probably we can just memcpy the memory containing the dbids.

Done.

>
> 4.
> + /*
> + * If worker is being reused, and there is vacancy in dbids array,
> + * just update dbids array and dbcount and we are done.
> + * But if dbids array is exhausted, stop the worker, reallocate
> + * dbids in dsm, relaunch the worker with same set of dbs as earlier
> + * plus the new db.
> + */
>
> Why do we need to relaunch the worker, can't we just use dsa_pointer
> to expand the shared memory whenever required?
>

Done.

> 5.
>
> +static bool
> +WaitForSlotSyncWorkerAttach(SlotSyncWorker *worker,
> +    uint16 generation,
> +    BackgroundWorkerHandle *handle)
>
> this function is an exact duplicate of WaitForReplicationWorkerAttach
> except for the LWlock, why don't we use the same function by passing
> the LWLock as a parameter
>
> 6.
> +/*
> + * Attach Slot-sync worker to worker-slot assigned by launcher.
> + */
> +void
> +slotsync_worker_attach(int slot)
>
> this is also very similar to the logicalrep_worker_attach function.
>
> Please check other similar functions and reuse them wherever possible
>

Will revisit these as stated in [1].

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJpy0uDeWjJj%2BU8nn%2BHbnGWkfY%2Bn-Bbw_kuHqgphETJ1Lucy%2BQ%40mail.gmail.com

> --
> Regards,
> Dilip Kumar
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com