On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 1:51 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Do you have any suggestions on how to achieve that without adding some
> additional variable? I think it is not a very hard requirement as we
> don't follow the same at other places in code.
>
Sorry, forget my suggestion, I see it's not easy to achieve it and
still execute the non-error-case code after the switch.
(you'd have to use a variable set in the default case, defeating the
purpose, or have the switch in a separate function with return for
each case)
So the 0001 patch LGTM.
Regards,
Greg Nancarrow
Fujitsu Australia