Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq
| От | Peter Smith |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAHut+Pthu7wpO4q9Heuxq8dvMH1vhSmUFEyDCPzyJBEG8PyEgQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq
Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
(This is not a code review - this is just to satisfy my curiosity)
I've seen lots of code like this where I may have been tempted to use
a ternary operator for readability, so I was wondering is there a PG
convention to avoid such ternary operator assignments, or is it simply
a personal taste thing, or is there some other reason?
For example:
if (msg)
res->errMsg = msg;
else
res->errMsg = libpq_gettext("out of memory\n");
VERSUS:
res->errMsg = msg ? msg : libpq_gettext("out of memory\n");
------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: