On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 7:44 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> As things stand, in this case I think it *should* be included, since the
> backpatched change isn't the same as the change to HEAD (removing the GUC).
> The git_changelog output might well be wrong in this case (or, arguably, the
> "remove the GUC entirely" should've been a separate master-only commit than the
> "make the GUC do nothing" commit).
I suppose that's true -- maybe it should be listed separately, because
the GUC is removed in 14 only.
> However, Peter indicated an intent to add a reloption to disable the vacuum
> optimization, so maybe the removal of the GUC could be documented at that time.
This is unrelated to the bypass indexes in VACUUM thing.
--
Peter Geoghegan