On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 6:23 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well I can report that the system from ec483147 was hellishly
> complicated, and not universally loved. Which isn't to say that there
> isn't a simple and loveable way to do it, waiting to be discovered,
> and I do think we could fix most of the problems with that work.
I admit that I don't have much idea of how difficult it would be to
make it all work. I'm definitely not claiming that it's easy.
> I understand that that's not ideal from an
> end-user perspective, but maybe it's more realistically and robustly
> and simply implementable. Hmm.
That may be a decisive reason to go with your proposal. I really don't know.
--
Peter Geoghegan