On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh. But then I don't see why you need min_parallel_anything. That's
> just based on an estimate of the amount of data per worker vs.
> maintenance_work_mem, isn't it?
Yes -- and it's generally a pretty good estimate.
I don't really know what minimum amount of memory to insist workers
have, which is why I provisionally chose one of those GUCs as the
threshold.
Any better ideas?
--
Peter Geoghegan