Re: annoyance with .git-blame-ignore-revs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: annoyance with .git-blame-ignore-revs
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WzkWZJfx=QoMZWh+qv6Pro_9AoZ8KFODAYwu366+URqE+A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на annoyance with .git-blame-ignore-revs  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Ответы Re: annoyance with .git-blame-ignore-revs  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 12:30 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> $ git blame configure
> fatal: could not open object name list: .git-blame-ignore-revs
>
> My first workaround was to add empty .git-blame-ignore-revs in all
> checkouts.  This was moderately ok (shrug), until after a recent `tig`
> upgrade the empty file started to show up in the history as an untracked
> file.

Ping? Would be nice to get this done soon. I don't think that it
requires a great deal of care. If I was doing this myself, I would
probably make sure that the backbranch copies of the file won't
reference commits from later releases. But even that probably doesn't
matter; just backpatching the file from HEAD as-is wouldn't break
anybody's workflow.

Again, to reiterate: I see no reason to do anything on the
backbranches here more than once.

I mentioned already that somebody proposed a patch that fixes the
problem at the git level, which seems to have stalled. Here is the
discussion:

https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqq5ywehb69.fsf@gitster.g/T/

ISTM that we're working around what is actually a usability problem
with git (imagine that!). I think that that's fine. Just thought that
it was worth acknowledging it as such. We're certainly not the first
people to run into this exact annoyance.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Allow file inclusion in pg_hba and pg_ident files